TTrialPathMatch Me to Trials
← Back to trials
RecruitingDental Implant Failed

Comparison of Conventional Impressions, Intraoral Scanners and Digital Photogrammetry for Full-arch Implant Prosthesis.

Eligible age

18+ yrs

Accepts

All genders

Locations

0 states

Healthy volunteers

Yes

See if you qualify for this study

Answer a few quick questions about your location and health. Takes about a minute.

Check my eligibility →

About this study

The aim of this clinical trial is to compare implant-supported definitive impressions in edentulous patients (mandible or maxilla) with 4 to 8 osseointegrated implants. The main questions it aims to answer are : The primary outcome of this prospective clinical comparative study is to analyse the precision of a complete-arch impression. The secondary aim is to obtain patient satisfaction with these new types of impression. The different impressions (conventional, intraoral scanner and photogrammetry) will be taken twice on the same patient.

Sponsor: Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Liege

You may qualify if…

  • edentulous maxilla or mandible with 4 to 8 osseointegrated implants (NobelBiocare®) and transgingival abutments tightened to 35N/cm (Multi-unit, NobelBiocare®).

You may not qualify if…

  • Patients with non-osseointegrated implants
  • Patients with different implant systems
  • Patients with incomplete edentulism

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · NCT06570499 · last updated 2024-08-26

Comparison of Conventional Impressions, Intraoral Scanners and Digital · TrialPath